Adjunctive techniques in endovascular repair of postcarotid endarterectomy pseudoaneurysm: Case report and literature review.

Pseudoaneurysm (PA) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a rare and dangerous complication. In recent years endovascular approach has been preferred to open surgery as it is less invasive and reduces complications in an already operated neck, especially cranial nerve injuries. We report a case of large post-CEA PA causing dysphagia, successfully treated by deployment of two balloon-expandable covered stents and coil embolization of the external carotid artery. A literature review dealing with all cases of post-CEA PAs since 2000 treated by endovascular means is also reported. The research was conducted on Pubmed database using keywords "carotid pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy," "false aneurysm after carotid endarterectomy," "postcarotid endarterectomy pseudoaneurysm," and "carotid pseudoaneurysm."

Covid-19 associated free hanging clots in acute symptomatic carotid stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic complications including stroke were previously described following Covid-19. We aim to describe the clinical and radiological characteristics of Covid-19 related with acutely symptomatic carotid stenosis (aSCS). METHOD: All patients presenting with an aSCS were prospectively enrolled in an ongoing institutional database. Inclusion criteria for the Covid-19-aSCS group were a combination of both antigen test and a positive reverse-transcriptase (PCR) test for Covid-19 upon admission. Patients with additional potential etiologies for stroke including cardioembolism, carotid dissection or patients with stenosis of <50% on CTA were excluded. A cohort of non-Covid-19 related aSCS patients admitted to the same institution before the pandemic during 2019 served as controls. RESULTS: Compared to controls (n = 31), Covid-19-aSCS (n = 8), were younger (64.2 ± 10.7 vs 73.5 ± 10, p = 0.027), and less frequently had hypertension (50% vs 90%, p = 0.008) or hyperlipidemia (38% vs 77%, p = 0.029) before admission. Covid-19-aSCS patients had a higher admission NIHSS score (mean 9 ± 7 vs 3 ± 4, p = 0.004) and tended to present more often with stroke (88% vs 55%, p = 0.09) rather than a TIA. Covid-19-aSCS patients had higher rates of free-floating thrombus and clot burden on CTA (88% vs 6.5%, p = 0.002). Covid-19 patients also less often achieved excellent outcomes, with lower percentage of mRS score of 0 after 90-days (13% vs 58%, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Covid-19- aSCS may occur in a younger and healthier subpopulation. Covid-19- aSCS patients may have higher tendencies for developing complex clots and less often achieve excellent outcomes.

Impact of the first COVID-19 pandemic peak and lockdown on the interventional management of carotid artery stenosis in France.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the trends of carotid revascularization (endarterectomy [CEA], transfemoral carotid artery stenting [TFCAS]) for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis before, during, and after the end of the first lockdown in 2020 in France. METHODS: Nationwide data were provided by the French National Hospital Discharge database (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information). We retrospectively analyzed patients admitted for CEA or TFCAS in all French public and private hospitals during a 9-month period (January-September) in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. Procedures were identified using the French Common Classification of Medical Procedures. Stenoses were considered symptomatic in the presence of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack codes (according to the International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision) during the stay, and asymptomatic in the absence of these codes. Hospitalization rates in 2020 were compared with the rates in the same period in the 3 previous years. RESULTS: Between January and September 2020, 12,546 patients were hospitalized for carotid artery surgery (CEA and TFCAS) in France. Compared with the 3 previous years, there was a decrease in hospitalization rates for asymptomatic (-68.9%) and symptomatic (-12.6%) CEA procedures in April, starting at the pandemic peak concomitant with the first national lockdown. This decrease was significant for asymptomatic CEA (P < .001). After the lockdown, while CEA for asymptomatic stenosis returned to usual activity, CEA for symptomatic stenosis presented a significant rebound, up 18.52% in August compared with previous years. Lockdown also had consequences on TFCAS procedures, with fewer interventions for both asymptomatic (-60.53%) and symptomatic stenosis (-16.67%) in April. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a severe decrease for all interventions during the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in France. However, the trends in the postlockdown period were different for the various procedures. These data can be used to anticipate future decisions and organization for cardiovascular care.